[S1M-2606.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 16 Jan 2002 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-2606.2
The description in the bulletin on 2002-01-16 is:
*S1M-2606.2 Ms Wendy Alexander: Scotland's Railways-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2606) in the name of Mr Kenny MacAskill, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "welcomes the publication of the Strategic Rail Authority's Strategic Plan and the vision it contains as a first, significant step towards a bigger, better and safer railway for Scotland." Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2606.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-2606.2, in the name of Wendy Alexander, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2606, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, on Scotland's railways, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 78.9% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 53 | 0 | 0 | 96.4% |
| LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 68.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 64 | 49 | 0 | 88.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||