[S1M-2994.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 18 Apr 2002 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S1M-2994.2
The description in the bulletin on 2002-04-18 is:
*S1M-2994.2 Alex Johnstone: Social Care Workforce Development-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2994) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from second "the work" to end and insert "with concern their increasing difficulty in carrying out these tasks owing to poor levels of staffing, increased bureaucracy and additional demands on what was already an over-stretched workforce, and therefore calls upon the Scottish Executive to redouble its efforts to secure an appropriately staffed and trained social care workforce which is capable of carrying out its necessary functions. Supported by: Ben Wallace*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2994.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-2994.2, in the name of Alex Johnstone, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2994, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on social care work force development, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 73.7% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 51 | 0 | 0 | 92.7% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 75.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 66 | 42 | 0 | 84.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |