Police Reform Bill [HL] — 25 Apr 2002 at 19:07

Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.

[Amendments Nos. 53 to 60 not moved.]

Schedule 5 [Powers exercisable by accredited persons]:

moved Amendment No. 61:

Page 141, line 11, leave out paragraph 2.

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 61) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 158; Not-Contents, 101.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con110 (+1 tell) 048.7%
Crossbench3 107.4%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Lab0 88 (+2 tell)45.7%
LDem42 (+1 tell) 065.2%
Total:155 9938.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbenchaye
Lord Monson Crossbenchaye
Lord Thomas of SwynnertonCrossbenchaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive