Proceeds of Crime Bill — 25 Jun 2002 at 17:23

moved Amendment No. 13:

Page 5, line 10, at end insert-

"(3A) But subsection (3) does not apply to an amount which has been taken into account for the purposes of a deduction under that subsection on any earlier occasion."

On Question, amendment agreed to.

moved Amendment No. 14:

Page 5, line 21, at end insert-

"(5) The reference to general criminal conduct in the case of a confiscation order made under any of the provisions listed in subsection (4) is a reference to conduct in respect of which a court is required or entitled to make one or more assumptions for the purpose of assessing a person's benefit from the conduct."

On Question, amendment agreed to.

moved Amendment No. 15:

After Clause 9, insert the following new clause-

"COMPENSATION OF CREDITORS

(1) Any person who was a creditor of the defendant at the time when the confiscation order was made may, within one year of the date of the order, make an application to the court for compensation.

(2) The court may require the enforcement authority to pay compensation to the applicant if it is satisfied that-

(a) as a result of the making of the order the defendant is wholly or in part unable to repay the debt;

(b) the debt was incurred for full consideration; and

(c) at the time the debt was incurred the applicant had no reason to believe that a confiscation order could be made against the defendant."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 15) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 159; Not-Contents, 136.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con109 (+1 tell) 049.8%
Crossbench11 811.0%
Green1 0100.0%
Lab0 125 (+2 tell)66.1%
LDem34 (+1 tell) 053.0%
Other0 17.1%
UUP1 050.0%
Total:156 13443.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbenchno
Lord Bhatia Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Bledisloe Crossbenchno
Lord Brightman Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Chorley Crossbenchno
Baroness Darcy de Knayth Crossbenchno
Viscount Tenby Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Weatherill Crossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive