[S1M-3248.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 26 Jun 2002 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S1M-3248.1
The description in the bulletin on 2002-06-26 is:
*S1M-3248.1 Nicola Sturgeon: Action on Waiting and Delayed Discharge—As an amendment to motion (S1M-3248) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, leave out from "delivering" to end and insert "the face of increasing in-patient and out-patient waiting times; is extremely concerned at the disturbing findings of the recent Audit Scotland report, Review of the management of waiting lists in Scotland; calls for deferred waiting lists to be abolished and for all patients to be given a maximum waiting time guarantee; supports the work of the National Waiting Times Unit but calls on the Scottish Executive to give a commitment that HCI will be used exclusively for NHS patients in Scotland, and supports more vigorous action on a range of fronts to reduce waiting times and the delays experienced by patients awaiting discharge from hospital." Supported by: Shona Robison*
You can search for this motion (S1M-3248.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S1M-3248.1, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3248, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on action on waiting and delayed discharge, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84.2% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 75.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 80 | 27 | 0 | 84.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |