Lords Amendment No. 110 — 22 Jul 2002 at 18:28

110 Clause 251, page 148, line 29, at beginning insert "Subject to section (Proceedings brought under section 251: defence of respondent),"

The Commons disagreed to this amendment for the following reason:

110A Because it is not appropriate to provide any such exceptions, the House having reached its decision without the opportunity for debate.

rose to move that this House do not insist on their Amendment No. 110 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 110A but do propose the following amendment in lieu thereof-

110BClause 2, page 2, line 21, at end insert-

"(6) The guidance must indicate that the reduction in crime is in general best secured by means of criminal investigations and criminal proceedings."

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 126; Not-Contents, 44.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 03.8%
Con0 27 (+1 tell)12.7%
Crossbench2 11 (+1 tell)8.1%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Lab119 (+2 tell) 063.0%
LDem0 23.0%
Other2 014.3%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:124 4224.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Ouseley Crossbenchaye
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive