[S1M-3351.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Sep 2002 at 17:00

This looks like the vote on S1M-3351.1

The description in the bulletin on 2002-09-05 is:

*S1M-3351.1 Mrs Lyndsay McIntosh: Throughcare and Aftercare of Looked After Children-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3351) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "and believes" to end and insert "but believes that the difficulties for young people leaving care should be addressed at an earlier stage to give them the best chance of coping with the challenges of successful adult living."

You can search for this motion (S1M-3351.1) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The fifth question is that amendment S1M-3351.1, in the name of Lyndsay McIntosh, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3351, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the throughcare and aftercare of looked-after children, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)AbstentionsTurnout
Con0 14073.7%
Independent0 2066.7%
Lab48 0087.3%
LDem16 00100.0%
SNP0 30090.9%
SSP0 10100.0%
Total:64 47087.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive