Enterprise Bill — 28 Oct 2002 at 17:00

moved Amendments Nos. 4 to 7:

Page 11, leave out lines 9 and 10 and insert-

"(1A) In such proceedings, the court is bound by a decision mentioned in subsection (2) once any period specified in subsection (3) which relates to the decision has elapsed."

Page 11, line 16, after "Tribunal" insert "(on an appeal from a decision of the OFT)""

Page 11, line 20, leave out subsection (3) and insert-

"(3) The periods mentioned in subsection (1A) are-

(a) in the case of a decision of the OFT, the period during which an appeal may be made to the Tribunal under section 46 or 47 or the EC Competition Law (Articles 84 and 85) Enforcement Regulations 2001 (S.I. 2001/2916);

(b) in the case of a decision of the Tribunal mentioned in subsection (2)(c), the period during which a further appeal may be made under section 49 or under those Regulations;

(c) in the case of any decision which is the subject of a further appeal, the period during which an appeal may be made to the House of Lords from a decision on the further appeal;

and, where any appeal mentioned in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) is made, the period specified in that paragraph includes the period before the appeal is determined."

Page 11, line 33, at end insert-

"(1A) Section 58A does not apply in relation to decisions made before the commencement of this section."

On Question, amendments agreed to.

Clause 22 [Relevant merger situations]:

moved Amendment No. 8:

Page 13, line 21, leave out "£45 million" and insert "£100 million"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 8) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 119; Not-Contents, 112.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con78 (+2 tell) 036.4%
Crossbench8 36.5%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Lab0 104 (+2 tell)55.5%
LDem29 043.9%
Other0 214.3%
Total:116 11034.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bhatia Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Roll of IpsdenCrossbenchno
Lord Weatherill Crossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive