Lords Amendment — 6 Nov 2002 at 19:07

17 Clause 14, page 9, line 8, at end insert- "( ) An accommodation centre shall be established only when the Secretary of State is satisfied that the proposed location is suitable to the needs of the persons to be accommodated therein."

The Commons disagreed to this amendment for the following reason-

17A Because it is unnecessary to restrict the power to establish an accommodation centre in the terms proposed.

rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on their Amendment No. 17 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 17A, at end insert "but do propose the following amendment in lieu thereof-

17BPage 9, line 8, at end insert- "( ) In determining the location of premises provided under this section the Secretary of State shall have regard to the needs of the persons to be accommodated therein." "

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 17B) shall be agreed to?

*Their Lordships divided: Contents, 171; Not-Contents, 120.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.0%
Con108 (+1 tell) 049.8%
Crossbench12 1013.0%
Green0 1100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Lab0 104 (+2 tell)55.5%
LDem48 (+1 tell) 074.2%
Other0 17.1%
UUP1 0100.0%
Total:170 11742.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Boothroyd Crossbenchno
Baroness Darcy de Knayth Crossbenchno
Baroness Greengross Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
The Earl of ListowelCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Moser Crossbenchno
Lord Skidelsky Crossbenchno
Lord Weatherill Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Williamson of HortonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Maginnis of DrumglassUUPno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive