[S1M-3648.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Nov 2002 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-3648.2
The description in the bulletin on 2002-11-28 is:
*S1M-3648.2 Roseanna Cunningham: Domestic Abuse—As an amendment to motion (S1M-3648) in the name of Ms Margaret Curran, insert at end "but nevertheless calls on the Scottish Executive to ensure that funding of services dealing with domestic violence is equalised across Scotland, to recognise and meet the needs of children affected by domestic violence, to address, as a matter of urgency, the recruitment crisis in social work services and to reform the justice system so as to allow the development of family courts which would include inter alia powers to deal with domestic violence." Supported by: Linda Fabiani*
You can search for this motion (S1M-3648.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-3648.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3648, in the name of Margaret Curran, on domestic abuse, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 0 | 17 | 89.5% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 68.8% |
SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 61 | 29 | 18 | 84.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |