[S1M-3958.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Mar 2003 at 16:43
This looks like the vote on S1M-3958.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-03-05 is:
*S1M-3958.1 Richard Lochhead: The Fishing Vessels (Decommissioning) (Scotland) Scheme 2003-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3958) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end "but, in doing so, calls on ministers to bring forward where necessary measures that ensure that, in the event of any decommissioning scheme, onshore businesses receive their due payments, the needs of the crews are taken into account and fishing entitlement is secured for the benefit of our fishing communities, and that vessels taken out of the industry are available for other uses in order to provide opportunities for onshore businesses to undertake conversions." Supported by: Stewart Stevenson*
You can search for this motion (S1M-3958.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-3958.1, in the name of Richard Lochhead, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3958, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the Fishing Vessels (Decommissioning) (Scotland) Scheme 2003 (SSI 2003/87), be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 13 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 0 | 26 | 0 | 78.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 62 | 44 | 1 | 83.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Ian Jenkins | Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale | LDem | aye |