[S2M-137] Decision Time — 19 Jun 2003 at 16:58
This looks like the vote on S2M-137
The description in the bulletin on 2003-06-13 is:
*S2M-137 Malcolm Chisholm: Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill - UK Legislation-That the Parliament endorses the principle of ensuring consistency in recovery of NHS charges where compensation is paid following injury as set out in Part 3 of the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill and agrees that the relevant provisions to achieve this end including extending ministers' powers to make regulations under a scheme for recovery should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe*
The description in the bulletin on 2003-06-16 is:
S2M-137 Malcolm Chisholm: Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament endorses the principle of ensuring consistency in recovery of NHS charges where compensation is paid following injury as set out in Part 3 of the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill and agrees that the relevant provisions to achieve this end including extending ministers’ powers to make regulations under a scheme for recovery should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe
You can search for this motion (S2M-137) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-137, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill, which is UK legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 88.5% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 76 | 35 | 0 | 86.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |