[S2M-310.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 10 Sep 2003 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-310.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-09-10 is:
*S2M-310.1 Mr Ted Brocklebank: Strategic Framework for Aquaculture-As an amendment to motion (S2M-310) in the name of Allan Wilson, leave out from "endorses" to end and insert "but regrets that the strategic framework for Scottish aquaculture increasingly looks more like a straightjacket, with no fewer than eight bodies currently overseeing it, and further regrets that the Executive has failed to make meaningful financial provision to the industry in terms of research and development, especially of new species, failed to protect the quality "Scottish" brand for farmed salmon and failed to safeguard the 6,500 Scottish jobs in salmon farming by its inadequate approach to dumping of inferior foreign product on the European market with the subsequent collapse in Scottish prices."
You can search for this motion (S2M-310.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-310.1, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S2M-310, in the name of Allan Wilson, on the strategic framework for aquaculture, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 21 | 0 | 80.8% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 76 | 37 | 0 | 90.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||