[S2M-329.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 Sep 2003 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S2M-329.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-09-11 is:
*S2M-329.1 Miss Annabel Goldie: Treatment of Asylum Seekers in Scotland-As an amendment to motion (S2M-329) in the name of Mr John Swinney, leave out from "calls for" to end and insert "deplores the operation by Her Majesty's Government of an inadequate and ineffectual policy on asylum and profoundly regrets the policy implications of such deficiencies for asylum seekers in Scotland".
You can search for this motion (S2M-329.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-329.1, in the name of Annabel Goldie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-329, in the name of John Swinney, on the treatment of asylum seekers in Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 26 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 108 | 17 | 0 | 97.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |