Hunting Bill: amendment — hare coursing — 28 Oct 2003 at 19:49
A vote on whether to support Clause 5 of the Hunting Bill, which contained a ban on hare coursing from the Hunting Bill, or to allow for (permitted) "registered" coursing.
Those voting content were voting to retain the ban; those voting non-content supported registered hare coursing.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 59; Not-Contents, 129.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.2% |
Con | 84 (+2 tell) | 2 | 41.1% |
Crossbench | 26 | 2 | 16.4% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 8 | 42 (+2 tell) | 27.1% |
LDem | 6 | 10 | 25.0% |
Total: | 126 | 56 | 27.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Bragg | Lab | no |
Lord Brooks of Tremorfa | Lab | no |
Lord Carlile of Berriew | LDem | no |
Viscount Colville of Culross | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |
Viscount Craigavon | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |
Lord Dahrendorf | LDem | no |
Lord Donoughue | Lab (minister) | no |
Viscount Falkland | LDem (front bench) | no |
Baroness Fookes | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Higgins | Con | aye |
Lord Howie of Troon | Lab | no |
Lord Mackie of Benshie | LDem | no |
Baroness Mallalieu | Lab (minister) | no |
Lord Randall of St Budeaux | Lab | no |
Lord Sharman | LDem | no |
Viscount Simon | Lab (minister) | no |
Lord Taverne | LDem | no |
Lord Temple-Morris | Lab (minister) | no |