Hunting Bill: amendment — tests for registration — 28 Oct 2003 at 22:44

An amendment to define tests of "utility" and "least suffering" which would given when hunting with dogs would be "registered" (and hence permitted) rather than banned.

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 106; Not-Contents, 22.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con69 (+1 tell) 133.2%
Crossbench20 011.7%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab5 (+1 tell) 17 (+2 tell)13.0%
LDem8 114.1%
Total:103 1919.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bragg Labaye
Lord Brennan Lab (minister)aye
Lord Donoughue Lab (minister)aye
Baroness Fookes Con (front bench)no
Baroness Harris of RichmondLDem (front bench)no
Lord Howie of TroonLabaye
Baroness Mallalieu Lab (minister)tellaye
Lord Randall of St BudeauxLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive