[S2M-526.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 30 Oct 2003 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S2M-526.2
The description in the bulletin on 2003-10-30 is:
*S2M-526.2 Fergus Ewing: Building Better Cities - Delivering Growth and Opportunities-As an amendment to motion (S2M-526) in the name of Mr Andy Kerr, leave out from "endorses" to end and insert "notes the concerns of many that the publication of the Review of Scotland's Cities was a modest response to the challenges facing Scottish cities and that the review neglects the opportunity to address properly important issues of transport infrastructure and finance."
You can search for this motion (S2M-526.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-526.2, in the name of Fergus Ewing, which seeks to amend motion S2M-526, in the name of Andy Kerr, on "Building Better Cities: Delivering Growth and Opportunities", be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 6 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 92.3% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 84 | 26 | 7 | 91.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||