Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Communications Data) Order 2003 — 13 Nov 2003 at 17:03
Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion, at end to insert "and this House calls upon Her Majesty's Government to lay a new draft order requiring the Interception of Communications Commissioner to inform any person who appears to have been adversely affected by any wilful or reckless failure on the part of any person exercising or undertaking any of the powers and duties conferred or imposed on him by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 in relation to the acquisition or disclosure of communications data, subject to national security safeguards".
On Question, Whether the said amendment shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 126; Not-Contents, 99.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||72 (+1 tell)||0||34.6%|
|Lab||1||91 (+2 tell)||50.5%|
|LDem||33 (+1 tell)||0||53.1%|
|Lord Hannay of Chiswick||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Roll of Ipsden||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Williamson of Horton||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Wedderburn of Charlton||Lab||aye|