[S2M-661.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 27 Nov 2003 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-661.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-11-27 is:
*S2M-661.1 Mr David Davidson: Physical Activity: The Need for Improvement and the Cost of Failure-As an amendment to motion (S2M-661) in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "notes the Executive's plans to emphasise walking as one of the means to increase levels of physical activity; encourages people to take more responsibility for their own health and that of their family; calls for more access to organised sport in schools and the community, and further calls on the Executive to provide more support for the voluntary sector, which provides a huge variety of sporting opportunities for children and adults alike".
You can search for this motion (S2M-661.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The sixth question is, that amendment S2M-661.1, in the name of David Davidson, which seeks to amend motion S2M-661, in the name of Tom McCabe, on physical activity, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 77.8% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 70.6% |
SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 92.3% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 3 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
Total: | 63 | 41 | 8 | 87.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Tommy Sheridan | Glasgow | whilst SSP | abstention |