[S2M-685.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 3 Dec 2003 at 17:06

This looks like the vote on S2M-685.2

The description in the bulletin on 2003-12-03 is:

*S2M-685.2 Nicola Sturgeon: Modernising Access to Legal Advice, Information and Representation-As an amendment to motion (S2M-685) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, insert at end ", but expresses concern that the reality for far too many people in need of legal advice, information and representation still falls far short of this standard, that availability of high quality legal advice and representation for people who cannot afford to pay for it is less accessible now than previously, and that access to advice and assistance from non-legally qualified providers, which in many circumstances is more appropriate than access to a solicitor, remains needlessly fragmented and geographically inconsistent due to a failure to build on best practice where it exists."

You can search for this motion (S2M-685.2) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-685.2, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S2M-685, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on modernising access to legal advice, information and representation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)AbstentionsTurnout
Con11 0061.1%
Green0 70100.0%
Independent0 1033.3%
Lab49 0098.0%
LDem14 0082.4%
SNP0 23088.5%
SSCUP0 10100.0%
SSP0 4066.7%
Total:74 36085.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive