[S2M-685.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 3 Dec 2003 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S2M-685.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-12-03 is:
*S2M-685.1 Miss Annabel Goldie: Modernising Access to Legal Advice, Information and Representation-As an amendment to motion (S2M-685) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, insert at end "; acknowledges, however, that improving confidence in our justice system means more than ensuring that people get legal advice, but is about creating a system of criminal justice in Scotland that works and in which the public has confidence, and therefore calls for an end to delays in cases coming to court, an end to automatic release of prisoners and the introduction of proper public accountability within our police forces."
You can search for this motion (S2M-685.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-685.1, in the name of Annabel Goldie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-685, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on modernising access to legal advice, information and representation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 11 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
| SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 88.5% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 97 | 12 | 1 | 85.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||