[S2M-715.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 10 Dec 2003 at 17:15
This looks like the vote on S2M-715.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-12-10 is:
*S2M-715.1 Mr Ted Brocklebank: Fisheries 2004-As an amendment to motion (S2M-715) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from second "that" to end and insert "in contrast to last year's negotiations which saw draconian cutbacks in white fish quotas with accompanying hardship for our coastal communities and urges the Executive to support the view of the vast majority of Scottish fishermen that it is time to end the discredited Common Fisheries Policy and to regain national control of UK waters."
You can search for this motion (S2M-715.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-715.1, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S2M-715, in the name of Ross Finnie, on fisheries 2004, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 92.3% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 75 | 43 | 1 | 93.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||