[S2M-215.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 3 Mar 2004 at 17:12
This looks like the vote on S2M-215.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-03 is:
*S2M-215.1 Shona Robison: National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill-As an amendment to motion (S2M-215) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, insert at end "but, in so doing, believes that there must be safeguards in place to ensure the independence of the proposed new Scottish Health Council and is concerned about the lack of detail in the Financial Memorandum regarding potential additional costs arising from the Bill."
You can search for this motion (S2M-215.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-215.1, in the name of Shona Robison, which seeks to amend motion S2M-215, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on the general principles of the National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 45 | 3 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 84.6% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 77 | 39 | 0 | 91.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Wendy Alexander | Paisley North | Lab | aye |
Maureen Macmillan | Highlands and Islands | Lab | aye |
Irene Oldfather | Cunninghame South | Lab | aye |