[S2M-1031.1 (Amendment)] Business Motion — 10 Mar 2004 at 14:41
This looks like the vote on S2M-1031.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-10 is:
*S2M-1031.1 Mark Ballard: Business Motion—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1031) in the name of Patricia Ferguson after "followed by Ministerial Statement on the Outcomes of the Ministerial Group on Tourism" insert "followed by Debate on GM Crops" Supported by: Patrick Harvie*, Carolyn Leckie*, Ms Rosemary Byrne*, Rosie Kane*, Frances Curran*, Tommy Sheridan*, Shiona Baird*, Robin Harper*, Mr Mark Ruskell*, Eleanor Scott*, Chris Ballance*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1031.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are three questions to be put. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1031.1, in the name of Mark Ballard, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 43 | 0 | 0 | 86.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 84.6% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 58 | 54 | 0 | 87.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||