[S2M-1033.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 Mar 2004 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-1033.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-11 is:
*S2M-1033.2 Roseanna Cunningham: The Historic Environment, A Valuable Resource for Scotland—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1033) in the name of Mr Frank McAveety, insert at end "; regrets that, notwithstanding the work done by individuals and organisations, there remain serious concerns about (a) a lack of both resources and information and (b) the failure to sufficiently protect, conserve, interpret and promote Scotland’s historic environment and endorses the call for a review of the historic environment backed up by a regular audit to measure progress."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1033.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-1033.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1033, in the name of Frank McAveety, on the historic environment-a valuable resource for Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 84.6% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 62 | 54 | 0 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||