Traffic Management Bill — Clause 9 — Removal of Certain Vehicles by Traffic Officers — 16 Mar 2004 at 17:33
I beg to move amendment No. 2, in page 5, line 19, at end insert-
'(3) When exercising any powers made under provisions referred to in subsection (1), and before arranging for the removal of a broken-down vehicle, a traffic officer shall, when this can be done without compromising safety or unreasonably impeding traffic-flow-
Question put, That the amendment be made:-
The House divided: Ayes 174, Noes 276.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 123 (+2 tell) | 0 | 77.2% |
| DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Independent Conservative | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 275 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 67.9% |
| LDem | 0 | 43 | 0 | 79.6% |
| PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Total: | 276 | 174 | 0 | 70.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||