Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill — 25 Mar 2004 at 18:29
moved Amendments Nos. 36 to 38:
Page 28, line 12, leave out "that refusal" and insert "any such refusal"
Page 29, line 32, leave out "a" and insert "more than one"
Page 29, line 34, leave out "that refusal" and insert "any such refusal"
On Question, amendments agreed to.
Clause 45: [Major infrastructure projects]:
moved Amendment No. 39:
Page 31, line 14, at end insert-
"( ) Any planning application that the Secretary of State declares is of national or regional importance, as designated through subsection (1), must be subject to an economic impact report.
( ) Any planning application for a major infrastructure project based on a site-specific proposal in a national policy statement White Paper shall be considered by an inspector who shall be able to question the need for a specific development."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 39) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 91; Not-Contents, 80.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 62 (+2 tell) | 0 | 30.2% |
| Crossbench | 4 | 2 | 3.5% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 74 (+2 tell) | 40.6% |
| LDem | 22 | 0 | 34.4% |
| Total: | 89 | 76 | 26.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Alton of Liverpool | Crossbench | no |
| The Earl of Erroll | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Robertson of Port Ellen | Crossbench | no |