[S2M-1116.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 31 Mar 2004 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S2M-1116.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-31 is:
*S2M-1116.2 Mr Jim Wallace: The Effect of Strip Stamps on the Whisky Industry-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1116) in the name of Murdo Fraser, Leave out from ", thereby adversely" to end and insert "; and therefore calls on HM Treasury to engage in further discussion with the industry on the impact of these measures with a view to reaching a satisfactory outcome which deals with tax fraud and would lead to the decision being reversed, failing which to ensure that a comprehensive package of compensation measures is put in place to minimise the impact on the industry. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1116.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are 11 questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1116.2, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1116, in the name of Murdo Fraser, on the effect of strip stamps on the whisky industry be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 6 | 0 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 88.5% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 112 | 4 | 1 | 91.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||