[S2M-1116.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 31 Mar 2004 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S2M-1116.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-31 is:
*S2M-1116.2 Mr Jim Wallace: The Effect of Strip Stamps on the Whisky Industry-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1116) in the name of Murdo Fraser, Leave out from ", thereby adversely" to end and insert "; and therefore calls on HM Treasury to engage in further discussion with the industry on the impact of these measures with a view to reaching a satisfactory outcome which deals with tax fraud and would lead to the decision being reversed, failing which to ensure that a comprehensive package of compensation measures is put in place to minimise the impact on the industry. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
Text Introducing Division:
There are 11 questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1116.2, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1116, in the name of Murdo Fraser, on the effect of strip stamps on the whisky industry be agreed to. Are we agreed?
There will be a division.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Abstentions||Turnout|