[S2M-1219] Decision Time — 29 Apr 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1219
The description in the bulletin on 2004-04-28 is:
*S2M-1219 Cathy Jamieson: Reducing Reoffending - Improving the Effectiveness of Custodial and Non-Custodial Sentences-That the Parliament notes the publication of Reduce, Rehabilitate, Reform - A Consultation on Reducing Reoffending in Scotland and recognises the need for significant improvement and change in the management of offenders serving custodial and non-custodial sentences in order to reduce reoffending and step up the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice system. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1219) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The final question is, that motion S2M-1219, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on reducing reoffending and improving the effectiveness of custodial and non-custodial sentences, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 88.5% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 112 | 5 | 1 | 92.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |