[S2M-1095] Decision Time — 6 May 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1095
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-25 is:
*S2M-1095 Malcolm Chisholm: National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe*
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-29 is:
S2M-1095 Malcolm Chisholm: National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe
The description in the bulletin on 2004-05-04 is:
S2M-1095 Malcolm Chisholm: National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe
You can search for this motion (S2M-1095) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that motion S2M-1095, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, that the National Health Service Reform (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 21 | 0 | 0 | 80.8% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 99 | 16 | 1 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||