[S2M-1464] Decision Time — 16 Jun 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1464
The description in the bulletin on 2004-06-15 is:
*S2M-1464 Cathy Jamieson: Family Matters: Improving Family Law in Scotland-That the Parliament agrees that family law reform must safeguard the best interests of children; believes that stability in families should be promoted and supported, and therefore supports the reform of family law so that it reflects the reality of families in Scotland today. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1464) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-1464, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on "Family Matters: Improving Family Law in Scotland", be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 6 | 0 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
| SNP | 20 | 0 | 0 | 76.9% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 96 | 16 | 0 | 87.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||