New Clause 1 — Infection control standards — 19 Jul 2004 at 17:45
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
The Bill has not been the subject of detail or aggressive controversy. We are all working towards one objective, which is to reach a point at which patients in the NHS, and the public generally, are protected to the maximum possible extent. A key part of that objective is securing good-quality infection control, not least in the NHS.
Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:-
The House divided: Ayes 163, Noes 297.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 125 (+2 tell) | 0 | 77.9% |
DUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16.7% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 297 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 73.5% |
LDem | 0 | 34 | 0 | 61.8% |
PC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.0% |
Total: | 297 | 163 | 0 | 72.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |