Armed Forces (Pensions and Compensation) Bill — 8 Sep 2004 at 16:15

Report received.

Clause 1 <[i>Pension and compensation schemes: armed and reserve forces]:

moved Amendment No. 1:

Page 1, line 14, at end insert-

"( ) Any scheme established under subsection (2) must provide that there shall be no onus on any claimant under the scheme to prove the fulfilment of any conditions for a claim thereunder and that the benefit of any reasonable doubt shall be given to the claimant."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 1) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 183; Not-Contents, 128.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop0 13.8%
Con104 049.3%
Crossbench30 (+1 tell) 319.4%
Lab1 (+1 tell) 120 (+2 tell)60.5%
LDem44 063.8%
UUP1 0100.0%
Total:180 12444.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Ashley of StokeLabaye
Lord Morris of ManchesterLabtellaye
Baroness Boothroyd Crossbenchno
Lord Ouseley Crossbenchno
Lord Roll of IpsdenCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive