[S2M-1882.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 27 Oct 2004 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S2M-1882.3
The description in the bulletin on 2004-10-27 is:
*S2M-1882.3 Ms Rosemary Byrne: Tackling Drugs Misuse: Protecting Scotland’s Communities—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1882) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "views with concern the growing problem in our communities due to drug misuse; views the current provision for drug treatment and support as entirely inadequate, and urges the Scottish Executive to work with all agencies with a view to integrating services and ensuring full resourcing allowing a range of appropriate services across communities."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1882.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-1882.3, in the name of Rosemary Byrne, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1882, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on tackling drugs misuse and protecting Scotland's communities, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 0 | 18 | 100.0% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 61 | 39 | 18 | 92.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |