[S2M-1882] Decision Time — 27 Oct 2004 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S2M-1882
The description in the bulletin on 2004-10-26 is:
*S2M-1882 Cathy Jamieson: Tackling Drugs Misuse: Protecting Scotland’s Communities—That the Parliament commends the Scottish Executive’s integrated approach to reducing the supply of drugs and protecting communities from drug-related offending, improving education and information for young people about the risks from drugs and increasing the range and effectiveness of local drug treatment and rehabilitation services to help people to become free from drug dependence. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1882) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-1882, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on tackling drugs misuse and protecting Scotland's communities, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 88 | 24 | 7 | 93.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||