[S2M-1940.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 4 Nov 2004 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S2M-1940.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-11-04 is:
*S2M-1940.2 John Swinburne: A Better Deal for Pensioners—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1940) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, insert at end "and restore the link, broken in 1982, between pensions and average national earnings." Supported by: Campbell Martin*, Dr Jean Turner*, Dennis Canavan*, Margo MacDonald*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1940.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S2M-1940.2, in the name of John Swinburne, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1940, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on a better deal for pensioners, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83.3% |
Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 1 | 94.0% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 96.0% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 60 | 52 | 1 | 89.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Elaine Smith | Coatbridge and Chryston | Lab | abstention |