Civil Contingencies Bill — Acts which could not be amended — 17 Nov 2004 at 14:30
The majority vote prevented the insertion of seven further constitutional acts of Parliament, in addition to the Human Rights Act 1998,[1] which could not be amended by Emergency regulation.
Those Acts were Habeas Corpus Act 1816, Parliament Act 1911, Bill of Rights 1989, Act of Settlement 1700, House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975, Life Peerages Act 1958, and the House of Lords Act 1999.[2]
- [1] Clause 23 of Civil Contingencies Act 2004
- [2] Commons Journal Volume 260 Page 616 for Tuesday 16th November 2004
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 118 (+2 tell) | 0 | 73.6% |
| DUP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Independent Conservative | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 303 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 74.9% |
| LDem | 46 | 0 | 0 | 83.6% |
| PC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
| SDLP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 350 | 135 | 0 | 75.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||