Civil Contingencies Bill — Lords Amendment — 18 Nov 2004 at 12:52
49 Clause 34, page 21, line 32, after "Act" insert ", except for the provisions of Part 2"
The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason- Because it is not desirable to limit the duration of Part 2.
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 49, to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 49A, at end insert "but do propose Amendment No. 49B in lieu thereof":
49B Page 21, line 33, at end insert "subject to the provisions of subsections (2A) and (2B) below"
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 49B) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 152; Not-Contents, 123.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 2 | 0 | 7.7% |
Con | 91 (+1 tell) | 0 | 43.8% |
Crossbench | 16 | 9 | 14.1% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 111 (+2 tell) | 55.1% |
LDem | 37 (+1 tell) | 0 | 55.1% |
Total: | 147 | 120 | 39.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Bhatia | Crossbench | no |
Lord Craig of Radley | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Howarth of Breckland | Crossbench | no |
Lord Marsh | Crossbench | no |
Lord Moser | Crossbench | no |
Lord Ouseley | Crossbench | no |
Viscount Slim | Crossbench | no |
Viscount Tenby | Crossbench | no |
Lord Williamson of Horton | Crossbench (front bench) | no |