Hunting Bill — reaction to Commons Amendments — 18 Nov 2004 at 18:20
A vote to insist on the previous Lords amendments to the Hunting Bill in place of the Commons amendments for a ban on hunting with dogs.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 153; Not-Contents, 114.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||103 (+1 tell)||1||50.7%|
|Lab||11 (+1 tell)||78 (+2 tell)||45.5%|
|Lord Bowness||Con (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Howarth of Breckland||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Roll of Ipsden||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Hunt of Chesterton||Lab||aye|
|Lord Irvine of Lairg||Lab||aye|
|Baroness Mallalieu||Lab (minister)||tellaye|
|Lord Renwick of Clifton||Lab||aye|
|Lord Rooker||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Viscount Simon||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Viscount Falkland||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Falkner of Margravine||LDem||aye|
|Baroness Linklater of Butterstone||LDem||aye|
|Lord Livsey of Talgarth||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne||LDem||aye|
|Lord Phillips of Sudbury||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Thomas of Gresford||LDem (front bench)||aye|