[S2M-2165.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 16 Dec 2004 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S2M-2165.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-16 is:
*S2M-2165.1 Mike Rumbles: Proposed Defence Reviews from a Scottish Perspective—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2165) in the name of Murdo Fraser, insert at end "as the best way to maintain the operational effectiveness of the Scottish infantry."
You can search for this motion (S2M-2165.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S2M-2165.1, in the name of Mike Rumbles, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2165, in the name of Murdo Fraser, on proposed defence reviews from a Scottish perspective, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 3 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 48 | 1 | 100.0% |
LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 60 | 55 | 12 | 99.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Kate Maclean | Dundee West | Lab | abstention |