[S2M-2166] Decision Time — 16 Dec 2004 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S2M-2166
The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-15 is:
*S2M-2166 Patricia Ferguson: Tourism - Ambitions for Scotland—That the Parliament recognises the economic benefits of promoting the long-term growth of Scotland’s tourism industry; approves of the Scottish Executive’s ambition, shared with VisitScotland and the tourism sector, of achieving 50% revenue growth over the next decade; notes that this will benefit the economies of rural as well as city and urban areas in every part of the country; appreciates that this long-term growth can only be achieved by ensuring that the marketing of Scotland in UK and overseas tourism markets is further strengthened and that the businesses that comprise the tourism and hospitality sectors are encouraged to compete even more strongly and coherently in this most competitive of global industries, and welcomes the additional funding given to VisitScotland to help achieve this. Supported by: Ms Margaret Curran*
You can search for this motion (S2M-2166) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The final question is, that motion S2M-2166, in the name of Patricia Ferguson, on tourism, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
Independent | 3 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 0 | 5 | 83.3% |
Total: | 95 | 18 | 14 | 99.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |