Administration and Works Committee — 21 Dec 2004 at 12:58

rose to move, That the first report from the Select Committee (HL Paper 209, Session 2003–04), be agreed to.

Moved, That the first report from the Select Committee (HL Paper 209, Session 2003–04), be agreed to.-(The Chairman of Committees.)

The report can be found at:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldaccwks/209/209.pdf

rose to move, as an amendment to the above Motion, to leave out "agreed to" and insert "referred back to the committee for further consideration, including:

(a) consultation with Members of the House, staff of the House and others concerned with smokers' rights, including the Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco;

(b) consideration of the rights of smokers in any future plans for the Writing Room and the possible partition of the present Writing Room on a temporary basis; and

(c) consideration of a possible reorganisation of the Bishops' Bar so that smoking could be permitted in one of the two rooms."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 1) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 41; Not-Contents, 116.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con13 2015.7%
Crossbench14 11 (+2 tell)15.3%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Independent Socialist0 1100.0%
Lab65 (+1 tell) 233.2%
LDem20 (+1 tell) 335.3%
Total:112 3823.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Astor of HeverCon (front bench)no
Lord Cope of BerkeleyCon (front bench)no
Earl Howe Con (front bench)no
Lord Howe of AberavonCon (front bench)no
Lord Hunt of WirralCon (front bench)no
Lord Jenkin of RodingConno
Lord King of BridgwaterConno
Lord MacGregor of Pulham MarketCon (front bench)no
The Duke of MontroseCon (front bench)no
Lord Norton of LouthCon (front bench)no
Baroness Perry of SouthwarkCon (front bench)no
Lord Renfrew of KaimsthornCon (front bench)no
Lord Trefgarne Conno
Viscount Bledisloe Crossbenchaye
Baroness Boothroyd Crossbenchaye
Lord Cobbold Crossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness D'Souza Crossbenchaye
The Earl of ErrollCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Greenway Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Harris of High CrossCrossbenchtellaye
Lord Monson Crossbenchtellaye
Lord Palmer Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Quirk Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lady Saltoun of AbernethyCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Walpole Crossbenchaye
Lord Weatherill Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Brooks of TremorfaLabaye
Lord Morris of ManchesterLabaye
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne DomerLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Russell-Johnston LDemaye
Lord Steel of AikwoodLDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive