[S2M-2298.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 26 Jan 2005 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S2M-2298.2
The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-26 is:
* S2M-2298.2 John Swinburne:Older People—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2298) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, insert at end “, accepts that, despite these actions, there remains a growing problem of the ageing population demographic timebomb and believes that, without immediate, positive Executive action, many older people will continue to be adversely affected and die in this wealthy society in the 21 st century.” Supported by: Margo MacDonald*
You can search for this motion (S2M-2298.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-2298.2, in the name of John Swinburne, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2298, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on older people, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 0 | 17 | 94.4% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 92.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 65 | 40 | 17 | 95.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |