[S2M-2298] Decision Time — 26 Jan 2005 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S2M-2298
The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-25 is:
* S2M-2298 Malcolm Chisholm: Older People—That the Parliament recognises the contribution that older people bring to our communities; recognises the substantial progress that has been made in meeting the needs of older people through policies such as free personal and nursing care, the central heating programme and free bus travel anywhere in Scotland at any time of day; welcomes other policy initiatives that benefit older people by promoting volunteering and lifelong learning and tackling anti-social behaviour; seeks to build on these by recognising the diversity of older people and tackling ageism, and welcomes the involvement of older people through the Older People’s Consultative Forum, and in other ways, in the development of policy across the Scottish Executive. Supported by: Johann Lamont*
You can search for this motion (S2M-2298) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-2298, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on older people, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
Independent | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 23 | 92.0% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 0 | 5 | 83.3% |
Total: | 86 | 0 | 35 | 94.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |