Constitutional Reform Bill [Lords] — [3rd Allotted Day] — New Clause 9 — Disqualification from holding further ministerial office — 1 Mar 2005 at 17:44
This division was for a huge number of amendments to the Consititutional Reform Bill. These amendments had not been discussed in the house but time was running short. Many were simply of a technical nature (changing wording) but some may have been more substantive.
The House having divided: Ayes 296, Noes 127.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 1 | 117 (+2 tell) | 0 | 74.5% |
| DUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 263 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 65.0% |
| LDem | 25 | 0 | 0 | 45.5% |
| PC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 40.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 296 | 127 | 0 | 65.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Peter Bottomley | Worthing West | Con (front bench) | aye |