Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review — 10 Mar 2005 at 33:00
The Aye-voters reaffirmed their vote earlier in Division 136, reaffirming Division 132 which reaffirmed their vote the day before in Division 125 which had evidently been overturned by the House of Lords.
This rejected proposal would have established a senior panel to review the operation of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 after eight months and make a report to Parliament.
It's not easy to find the compromises, which are amendments Nos. 27C, 27D and amendment (a). A publically available (and readable) record of what exactly was going on is in shambles, and about as easy as reading the output from a paper shredder.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||143 (+1 tell)||0||89.4%|
|Lab||307 (+2 tell)||9||0||77.9%|
|LDem||0||50 (+1 tell)||0||92.7%|
|Clare Short||Birmingham, Ladywood||Lab||no|
|Diane Abbott||Hackney North and Stoke Newington||Lab||no|
|Mr Brian Sedgemore||Hackney South and Shoreditch||Lab||no|
|Glenda Jackson||Hampstead and Highgate||Lab||no|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||no|
|Kelvin Hopkins||Luton North||Lab (minister)||no|
|Alan Simpson||Nottingham South||Lab (minister)||no|
|Kate Hoey||Vauxhall||Lab (minister)||no|