[S2M-2644.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 24 Mar 2005 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S2M-2644.1
The description in the bulletin on 2005-03-24 is:
* S2M-2644.1 Jim Mather: Life Sciences—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2644) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from “endorses” to end and insert “and also recognises the need to root that spirit and its resultant wealth in Scotland by gaining the economic powers that will allow Scotland to produce an increasingly more competitive proposition, thereby retaining and attracting more investment and talented people and providing an environment that encourages the growth of indigenous and multi-national businesses in Scotland.”
You can search for this motion (S2M-2644.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-2644.1, in the name of Jim Mather, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2644, in the name of Jim Wallace, on life sciences, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 77.8% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 6 | 85.7% |
Independent | 1 | 3 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 43 | 0 | 0 | 87.8% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 76.5% |
SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 92.0% |
SSP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Total: | 75 | 26 | 7 | 85.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |