Terrorism Bill — Timetable (No. 2) — 9 Nov 2005 at 13:23
Those voting Aye were voting for a change to the timetable for debate on the Terrorism Bill, from what it was set down in Division 71.
The change was to give slightly more time than originally planned for the debate, allowing extra time for the numerous divisions that were anticipated to take place while the clock was stopped. The most contentious Clause 23 (extension of period of detention to 90 days) would have a debate lasting three hours, and the debate over clauses 1 to 22 would last a further three hours.
Those voting No were not necessarily in favour of keeping the original shorter timetable; many wanted more time for debate and consideration to take place.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 136 (+2 tell) | 0 | 70.4% |
| DUP | 0 | 8 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Lab | 317 (+2 tell) | 3 | 0 | 91.0% |
| LDem | 0 | 55 | 0 | 88.7% |
| PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 317 | 213 | 0 | 84.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Lynne Jones | Birmingham, Selly Oak | Lab (minister) | no |
| Clare Short | Birmingham, Ladywood | whilst Lab | no |
| Alan Simpson | Nottingham South | Lab | no |