[S2M-3658.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Dec 2005 at 17:02

This looks like the vote on S2M-3658.2

The description in the bulletin on 2005-12-01 is:

*S2M-3658.2 Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Ambitious, Excellent Schools: One Year On—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3658) in the name of Peter Peacock, leave out from "recognises" to end and insert "acknowledges the aims of the Scottish Executive’s agenda in Ambitious, Excellent Schools; believes, however, that in order for each child to have the opportunity to reach his or her potential, the Executive must explore all avenues for supporting schools in providing the broadest range of subjects to stimulate the broad range of our children’s aptitude and interest; notes that the Executive’s schools modernisation programme, set out in The 21st Century School, Building Our Future: Scotland’s School Estate, is leading to many valued rural primary schools being closed or amalgamated with other schools on new sites in the name of rationalisation; acknowledges that in order to achieve its professed aim of emphasising strong leadership and greater freedom for teachers, schools must be granted more genuine autonomy, and urges the Executive to consider education reforms of the sort being contemplated at Westminster, so that every school will be able to become a self-governing independent state school to give genuine choice and opportunity to all pupils."

You can search for this motion (S2M-3658.2) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The second question is, that amendment S2M-3658.2, in the name of Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3658, in the name of Peter Peacock, on "ambitious, excellent schools", one year on, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)AbstentionsTurnout
Con0 170100.0%
Green6 0085.7%
Independent2 0160.0%
Lab48 0096.0%
LDem16 0094.1%
SNP23 0092.0%
SSCUP1 00100.0%
SSP5 0083.3%
Total:101 17193.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive