[S2M-3792.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 Jan 2006 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S2M-3792.3
The description in the bulletin on 2006-01-11 is:
*S2M-3792.3 Mr Mark Ruskell: Sustainable Development Strategy—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3792) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end “and moreover makes it clear that leadership and consistent action from the top of government is of critical importance to enable lasting change; considers the progress so far by the Executive since 1999 to be richer in rhetoric than reality but, nevertheless, a full 13 years since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, welcomes this first step towards a meaningful strategy; considers that sustainable development should be the top priority of government, and recognises the critical role of this Parliament and its structures in engaging fully with the strategy and holding the Executive to account on its delivery.” Supported by: Mark Ballard*
You can search for this motion (S2M-3792.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S2M-3792.3, in the name of Mark Ruskell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3792, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the sustainable development strategy, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
: No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 1 | 60.0% |
Lab | 46 | 1 | 0 | 94.0% |
LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 78 | 16 | 21 | 89.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Karen Whitefield | Airdrie and Shotts | Lab | aye |